![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Return to Professional Judgment |
US Department of Education Dear Colleague Letter GEN-98-2
January 1998
GEN-98-2
Subject: This letter clarifies several issues regarding student
eligibility policy that have arisen as a result of recently enacted
legislation or as a result of questions from the student aid
community.
Reference: Chapter 2 of the Student Financial Aid Handbook;
Chapters 3 and 5 of the 1997-98 Verification Guide.
Dear Colleague:
We have reconsidered several policy matters regarding student
eligibility as a result of recently enacted legislation. In addition,
we have clarified other policy matters regarding student eligibility
as a result of receiving numerous questions. Therefore, we are
providing the following information to members of the financial aid
community.
A number of institutions have requested clarification of the
Department's policy with regard to the circumstances under which a
student may update his or her household size and the number of family
members enrolled in postsecondary education. The Department's policy,
as reflected in the verification regulations and Chapter 3 of the
1996-97 and 1997-98 Verification Guides, is that beginning with award
year 1996-97, an applicant may not update that information unless the
applicant is selected for verification. On the other hand, an
applicant who is selected for verification, either by the Department
or by the institution, must update that information as of the date the
applicant is verified.
Flexible spending arrangements (FSAs) are employee benefit programs
provided by some employers under which certain expenses for the
employee's dependent care and health-care costs are paid. An employee
authorizes his or her employer to deduct wages on a tax-deferred basis
to be placed in special accounts specifically designated for dependent
care or health care reimbursement. These accounts are primarily funded
through salary deductions, although some employers also make
contributions. The employees' contributions to these accounts are not
subject to Federal income tax, FICA, and most state and local taxes
during the tax year that the contributions are made.
Various suggestions for treatment of FSA contributions under the need
analysis process have been offered and considered. We are persuaded by
the argument that FSAs are essentially employee benefit programs, and
that the Federal need analysis should not target these contributions
since it does not consider other types of employee benefits in
calculating a family's ability to pay for educational expenses.
Therefore, applicants are instructed not to include contributions to
FSAs as untaxed income.
Individuals with at least 50% Native American blood who were born in
Canada have certain unique rights under the Jay Treaty of 1794,
subsequent treaties, and U.S. Immigration Law. The Jay Treaty
provides that Native Americans with at least 50% Native American blood
who were born in Canada have the legal right to enter freely into the
United States. They are not required to obtain documentation from the
U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and are deemed
"lawfully admitted for permanent residence" and, thus, eligible for
Title IV student financial assistance.
Because there are very few Title IV aid applicants who are eligible
under the Jay Treaty, the citizenship question on the FAFSA does not
have a separate response for such students. A Native American who is
eligible for Title IV aid because of the Jay Treaty should report on
the FAFSA that he or she is an "eligible noncitizen" and should fill
in the Alien Registration Number with "A999999999." When the
application is matched by the central processor (CPS) with the INS,
this response will not be confirmed. It is then the responsibility of
the financial aid administrator to obtain proof that the student has
50% Native American blood and was born in Canada.
Documentation of the applicability of Jay Treaty status for an
applicant can be accomplished by asking the student to provide one or
more of the following documents:
If a Canadian-born Native American with at least 50% Native American
blood can provide one of the above forms of documentation, and meets
other Title IV eligibility criteria, the institution, after
documenting the student's file may award the student Title IV aid.
Section 484(a)(5) of the HEA recognizes as eligible for Title IV, HEA
assistance a student who is "able to provide evidence from the
Immigration and Naturalization Service that he or she is in the United
States for other than a temporary purpose with the intention of
becoming a citizen or permanent resident." The Department has
published annually in Appendix A to Chapter 2 of the Student Financial
Aid Handbook the various INS statuses and documentation that qualify
under the "other than a temporary purpose" category.
On August 22, 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104 - 193, (PRAWORA) was signed into
law and became effective. Section 401 of PRAWORA excludes any alien
who is not a "qualified" alien from eligibility for any Federal public
benefit (a term that, as defined in the Act, includes the Title IV
programs). Section 431 of PRAWORA restricts the definition of
"qualified alien" to six defined categories: 1) lawfully admitted
permanent residents; 2) asylees; 3) refugees; 4) aliens paroled into
the United States for at least one year; 5) aliens who have been
granted a stay of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. section 1253(h) due
to fear of persecution on account of race, religion or political
opinion; and 6) aliens who have been granted conditional entry under
rules in effect prior to April, 1980.
The Secretary has determined that two categories of non-citizens
previously determined to be eligible under section 484(a)(5) of the
HEA are no longer eligible because of sections 401 and 431 of
PRAWORA. The two ineligible categories are: aliens granted family
unity status and temporary residents under the Immigration Reform and
Control Act of 1986. Students in these categories do not fit the
definition of "qualified alien," and, thus, are no longer considered
eligible noncitizens for purposes of receiving Title IV, HEA
assistance. As a result of these changes, the only categories of
eligible noncitizens that qualify for Title IV, HEA assistance are
those in categories 1) through 6) listed in the previous paragraph.
There has been some concern about another provision of PRAWORA that
placed certain restrictions on the eligibility of "qualified aliens"
(which includes permanent residents) for federal "means-tested" public
benefits. PRAWORA, however, excluded all programs under Title IV of
the HEA from these restrictions. "Qualified aliens" (as discussed
above) who meet the requirements of the HEA may continue to receive
student financial assistance without regard to the restrictions on
"means-tested" public benefits in PRAWORA.
Several institutions have reported instances in which foreign-born
children of U.S. citizens have not been confirmed as U.S. citizens by
the data match with the Social Security Administration. If the student
does not have any other proof of U.S. citizenship (passport,
certificate from the State Department, etc.), he or she can obtain
documentation of U.S. citizenship by either of the following
procedures, whichever is applicable.
If the student's birth was registered with the American Consulate or
Embassy in a foreign country before the student turned 18, the student
can write to the Department of State, Passport Correspondence Branch,
1111 19th Street, Suite 510, SW, Washington, D.C. 20522-1705. The
student will need to provide his or her name at birth, date and place
of birth, parents' names, dates and places of parents' birth, a
daytime telephone number, and a $10 check or money order payable to
the Department of State. After four to eight weeks, the student should
receive either Department of State Form FS-240 or Department of State
Form DS-1350, either of which is acceptable for documenting
U.S. citizen status.
If the student's birth was not registered and the student is now 18
years of age or older, he or she can file a self petition for
"Certification of Citizenship" at a local Immigration and
Naturalization Service office on INS form N-600. Proof of the parents'
U.S. citizenship at the time of the child's birth must be provided.
The resultant Certification of Citizenship is acceptable for
documenting the student's U.S. citizen status.
In response to requests from the financial aid community, we have
modified our policy regarding loan limits for FFEL and Direct Loan
borrowers holding 4-year degrees who are taking coursework required
for admission into graduate or professional level programs. We have
revised our policy for these students so that the annual loan limits
are the same as those for fifth-year undergraduates. These limits are
consistent with the limits permitted for degree-holding borrowers
enrolled in teacher certification programs. This modified policy is
effective for loans originated or certified on or after January 16,
1997.
The statutory requirement that the coursework cover no more than a
single, consecutive, twelve-month period continues to apply, as does
the requirement that the school collect documentation that the
coursework is required for admission into a graduate or professional
program.
We understand that preparatory coursework required for admission into
a graduate or professional program may be taken at a community college
or at other schools that do not usually originate or certify
grade-level five loans. These schools may originate or certify a loan
at the fifth-year level for their students who are taking coursework
required for admission into graduate or professional level programs.
Under the FFEL Program, schools should coordinate with their lenders
and guaranty agencies in order to prevent system edits from rejecting
grade-level five certification records received from schools not
normally approved to certify above grade-level two. The Direct Loan
Program Loan Origination Center (LOC) is able to accept grade-level
five originations from schools that do not normally originate loans
above grade-level two.
Regulations at 34 CFR 600.9 require an eligible "home" institution to
give credit to students enrolled in a program under a consortium
agreement with another institution on the same basis as if the home
institution had provided that program.
The 1996-97 Student Financial Aid Handbook clarified that the phrase
"credit on the same basis" meant that the home institution was
required to accept "D" grades earned at the "other" institution if the
home institution accepted "D" grades for credit at its own campus.
We have reconsidered this policy on the acceptance of "D" grades. An
eligible institution that enters into a consortium agreement with
another institution for a portion of its eligible program may decline
to give its students credit for courses in which those students earned
a grade of "D" at the other institution. This policy is in effect even
if the home institution has a policy of accepting "D" grades for
credit earned at the home institution. This new policy is reflected in
the 1997-98 Student Financial Aid Handbook.
Institutions are reminded that the authority granted the financial aid
administrator (FAA) in section 479A of the HEA to use professional
judgment does not apply to general modifications to the formula(s) or
tables used in the calculation of an applicant's expected family
contribution (EFC). This prohibition includes the replacement or
modification of values such as the income protection allowance, tax
allowances, taxation rates from adjusted available income,
etc. Section 479A also does not allow the FAA to make adjustments to
an applicant's cost of attendance or to any of the data items used to
calculate the EFC simply because the FAA believes that the values
contained in the EFC tables are generally not appropriate or adequate
for its Title IV applicants and their families. Individual special
circumstances must exist, and be documented, before an FAA may make a
professional judgment adjustment.
When considering whether to use professional judgment to adjust for
special circumstances related to an applicant's unusual expenses,
financial aid administrators should keep in mind that the income
protection allowance in the need analysis formula already accounts for
an amount of income that would be required to maintain a modest living
standard for the family. For example, during the 1997-98 award year,
the income protection allowance for a family of four with one student
in college will be $18,070. Of this amount, $1,987.70 represents
family expenditures for medical care. Although a family with $2,000 in
annual medical expenses may understandably consider these expenses to
be worthy of professional judgment consideration, the expenses have
already been taken into account in the need analysis formula.
As a rule of thumb, the income protection allowance (Table C3 in the
1997-98 EFC Formula Book) comprises the following: food - 30%; housing
- 22%; transportation - 9%; clothing and personal care - 16%; medical
care - 11%; and other family consumption - 12%.
For further information on any of these issues you may contact the
Department's Customer Support Inquiry Service, between the hours of
9:00 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Time, at 1-800-433-7327. After hours calls
will be accepted by an automated voice response system. Callers
leaving their name and phone number will receive a return call the
next business day. You may FAX your inquiry to the Customer Support
Inquiry Service at any time by calling (202) 260-4199 or you may
e-mail your inquiry to the following internet address: csb@sfa.ed.gov.
I hope this information is helpful to you in administering the Title
IV, HEA student financial assistance programs.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth M. Hicks |
| Home | Loans | Scholarships | Savings | Military Aid | Other Types of Aid | Financial Aid Applications Answering Your Questions | Calculators | Beyond Financial Aid | Site Map | About FinAid® |
| Copyright © 2009 by FinAid Page, LLC. All rights reserved. Mark Kantrowitz, Publisher www.FinAid.org |